> Carl S. Gutekunst wrote:
> > I get leery any time the specs assume that the guy running the
> > mail server and the guy running the DNS server are on speaking
> > terms.
> No matter what 2821bis will say, when IPv6 enters the picture
> they need to talk.
They already need to talk in the worst way but they don't. (Too much desire for
fiefdoms, I suppose.) And I don't see IPv6 forcing the issue. It can easily see
being the recipient of a one-way "in addition to having IPv4 address foo for
domain bar, you now have IPv6 address foo6, enjoy" message.
> The mail guy in an IPvX network will want
> mail from non-IPvX networks.
And they'll arrange it by setting up a relay of some kind. Perhaps
the case we should be looking at is this:
MX IN MX 10 IPV6
MX IN MX 20 IPV4
IPV6 IN AAAA ...
IPV4 IN A ...
Ned
