Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
Dave Crocker writes:
Difficult to see how much more completely it can be explained that
this is out of scope for the current effort.
A supporting argument would help. Try a sentence like "keeping the same
rules as in 2821 is out of scope because ..." or better "adding AAAA to
the rule about A is in scope and appropriate because ...".
Ahh, I see. Since there have already been quite a few postings, by several
different people, that explained this, it looks like a review of the archive is
in order.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
