On Apr 2, 2008, at 2:27 AM, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:


However, trying to squeeze that effort into the RFC2821bis process is a good way to kill both.

It would be good to have wording for 2821bis that neither consciously extends the A rule nor consciously doesn't extend it. But I can't think of a way to do it.

WWTHD (What Would Ted Hardie Do): be blunt. "After much discussion on the topic, this specification does not extend the A rule to AAAA records, but neither does it preclude a parallel treatment."

Lisa

Reply via email to