On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, Paul Hoffman wrote:

>
> At 6:58 PM +0200 4/4/08, Michael Storz wrote:
> >Now, we can speculate
> >
> >- Is the missing MX RR by intention?
>
> Yes. Is there an email address at mail.imc.org that you wanted to send mail 
> to.
>
> >- Is the administrator clueless?
>
> Sometimes.
>
> >- Is he lazy?
>
> Often times.
>
> >- Is it just a configuration error (mail.imc.org instead of imc.org)?
>
> No. imc.org has an MX record, and has for over a decae.
>
> >or we could just ask Paul Hoffman :-)
>
> Or, you can be more specific. What is the problem of a host that is
> never expected to be on the RHS of an email address expected to have
> an MX record? That's an honest question, given that it has been over
> 12 years with the current setup.
>
Sorry for not being specific enough, I thought it would be obvious after
looking into the header of the message. I am referring to the address
[EMAIL PROTECTED] In the meantime I am convinced that it is a
configuration error, because I looked into my archive:

>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 27 04:22 MET 1999
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov  3 00:37 MET 1999
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov  3 07:14 MET 1999
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 10 23:22 MET 2000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 11 00:30 MET 2000

Regards,
Michael Storz
--
======================================================
Leibniz-Rechenzentrum      |    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Boltzmannstr. 1            |    Fax: +49 89 35831-9700
85748 Garching / Germany   |    Tel: +49 89 35831-8840
======================================================

Reply via email to