--On Thursday, 17 April, 2008 11:42 +0100 Tony Finch
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Apr 2008, John C Klensin wrote:
>>
>> And, unless I misread your note, I think that puts us in
>> violent agreement.
>
> Yes :-)
>
> (Assuming that by "lower priority MX" you mean
> higher-numbered.)
Indeed.
john
- Re: IPv6 addresses and IPv4 hosts Hector Santos
- Re: IPv6 addresses and IPv4 hosts John C Klensin
- Re: IPv6 addresses and IPv4 hosts Hector Santos
- Re: IPv6 addresses and IPv4 hosts (was: Re: I-D ... John Leslie
- IPv4 / IPv6 interaction John Leslie
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt Willie Gillespie
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt John C Klensin
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt Tony Finch
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt John C Klensin
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt Tony Finch
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt John C Klensin
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt John C Klensin
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt Keith Moore
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt John Leslie
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt Keith Moore
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt SM
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt Hector Santos
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt Keith Moore
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt Tony Finch
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt Keith Moore
