On Fri, 25 Apr 2008, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote: > > 2821 4.5.5 lists some types for which you should use the null path. It doesn't > forbid using <> for types not on its list.
All other types of messages (i.e., any message which is not required by a standards-track RFC to have a null reverse-path) SHOULD be sent with with a valid, non-null reverse-path. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://dotat.at/ SOUTHEAST ICELAND: CYCLONIC 4 OR 5, BECOMING NORTHEASTERLY 6 TO GALE 8, PERHAPS SEVERE GALE 9 LATER. MODERATE OR ROUGH. RAIN AT TIMES. MODERATE OR GOOD, OCCASIONALLY POOR.
