Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote: > Jon Postel chose to use more domains than 2606 provides
JFTR, 821 < 2606. All RFC 821 examples use TLD .arpa, s/.arpa/.example/g in RFC 821 could work. Maybe you tried your exampl-ification later, not based on RFC 821 (?) John Klensin wrote: > Please remember this line of argument and experience when > the IESG issues the promised document promoting 2606 to a > firm requirement. :-( Nobody can redefine RECOMMENDED to mean REQUIRED. Nobody seriously proposed to say MUST. Frank
