Ivar Lumi a écrit : > > >> But please do not confuse the mailbox syntax of SMTP (5321, >> etc.) with that of the message body and headers (5322, etc.). > Hmm no i see, there is problematic place. Bot declare "mailbox" term. > Also both RFC cross refer each other: > RFC 5322 3.6.7 has some definition for received and refers to RFC 5321. > > RFC 5321 4.4 The time stamp line and the return path line are formally > defined as > follows (the definitions for "FWS" and "CFWS" appear in RFC 5322 > <./rfc5322> [4 <#ref-4>]): > > >> Please reread the text that discourages machine interpretation >> of trace fields. > After fast re look, i can't find it, can you point section where it is. > About address-list, yes probably this is probably wrong list to ask how > there addresses distinguished. >
RFC 5321, section 3.7.2: "Received:" header fields of messages originating from other environments may not conform exactly to this specification. ...
