Tony Hansen wrote:
> Ahhh, there's where the difference in interpretation lays. One
> interpretation is that the remote side is required to forget the value
> that was passed with the original EHLO command. Another interpretation
> is that it further must forget that an EHLO command was issued at all.
>
> I guess I can see either interpretation of the STARTTLS spec.
>   
Hence my question. I interpreted it the same as you, but it was apparent
that the authors of Exim interpreted it the same as Tony Finch. Maybe
clarification is needed.

-- 
Paul Smith

VPOP3 - POP3/SMTP/IMAP4/Webmail Email server for Windows

Reply via email to