--On Thursday, October 22, 2009 19:21 +0100 Paul Smith <[email protected]> wrote: >... > As I see it, you could somehow work out a protocol for telling > something that is sending you 5000 TB of data to 'stop it > please', but (a) it could ignore you or (b) it could stop, but > then start again straight away, so it sends you 10MB, then > another 10MB, then another 10MB ad disk-blow-upeum. > > This can happen with pretty much any protocol anywhere. >... And that analysis is almost certainly one of the reasons why the multipart/partial idea in MIME has never gone much of anywhere as a useful tool. john
- Re: Abort data transfer? Hector Santos
- RE: Abort data transfer? Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: Abort data transfer? Dave CROCKER
- RE: Abort data transfer? ned+ietf-smtp
- RE: Abort data transfer? Tony Finch
- Re: Abort data transfer? Paul Smith
- Re: Abort data transfer? ned+ietf-smtp
- Re: Abort data transfer? David MacQuigg
- Re: Abort data transfer? Hector Santos
- Re: Abort data transfer? Paul Smith
- Re: Abort data transfer? John C Klensin
- Re: Abort data transfer? Tony Finch
- Re: Abort data transfer? John C Klensin
- Re: Abort data transfer? ned+ietf-smtp
- Re: Abort data transfer? Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: Abort data transfer? Hector Santos
- Re: Abort data transfer? Hector Santos
- Re: Email System Model Alessandro Vesely
- Backup MXes (was: Re: Email ... Alessandro Vesely
- Re: Backup MXes (was: Re: Em... John C Klensin
- Re: Email System Model Hector Santos
