> We really don't care about the proper SMTP response if it is spam. I suppose that's the case if you're sure that deferring the processing will never produce a bounce message.
R's, John
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA ned+ietf-smtp
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA ned+ietf-smtp
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA Hector Santos
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA Carl S. Gutekunst
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA Carl S. Gutekunst
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA SM
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA Nathaniel Borenstein
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA David MacQuigg
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA Carl S. Gutekunst
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA David MacQuigg
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA John Levine
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA David MacQuigg
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA Дилян Палаузов
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA David MacQuigg
- Re: per user post-data rejects, Proce... Дилян Палаузов
- Re: per user post-data rejects, Proce... David MacQuigg
- Re: per user post-data rejects, Proce... Дилян Палаузов
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA ned+ietf-smtp
- Re: per user post-data rejects, Proce... John Levine
- Re: per user post-data rejects, Proce... ned+ietf-smtp
- Re: per user post-data rejects, Proce... Dave CROCKER
