Thomas Narten wrote:
> > 2. IETF working group mailing lists NEED to be run on an IETF system.
>
> Since no VPN WG was ever formed, this mailing list would not have been
> eligible to be an official IETF list.
That would be one possible policy. Another would be, "OK, if we're going
to hold a BoF, then maybe it'll turn into a WG, and we don't want to
migrate the list, so let's host the BoF list at ietf.org".
(Mind you, I'm not certain about the premise that having IETF host the
lists would help--the current system is a little messy, but it has the
advantage of spreading the cost out to the people that are most interested
in seeing the work done.)
--
/==============================================================\
|John Stracke | http://www.ecal.com |My opinions are my own.|
|Chief Scientist |=============================================|
|eCal Corp. |Id est fabula nostra, et non mutabimus eam! |
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|--House Falconguard and Affiliated Scum |
\==============================================================/
