> The Action Item(s) for the Working Group are
> 
> 1. An Informational RFC specifying the requirements for I18N of Domain
>    Names and considerations for developing a solution to the problem.
> 
> 2. An Informational RFC documenting down the various proposal and 
>    Implementation of I18N of Domain Names. 

Wouldn't it be better for the WG to have an explicit goal of defining
standards-track protocols and operational requirements for
internationalization of the domain name system?  Informational RFC's
are useful, but not nearly as useful as interoperable standardized
protocol implementations.

        John

Reply via email to