At 10:49 17.12.99 -0500, Dick St.Peters wrote:
>Communication has the unusual property of having two users, and sender
>and recipient don't always agree on what they want. I for one think
>it is *not* the ietf's job to continue making it ever easier to send
>what recipients do not want. The recipients' wishes deserve respect,
>and the inability of email (as it exists today) to take them into
>account is a major flaw.
And we're trying to address that - see the RESCAP WG.
Warning: it won't be easy, and probably won't be pretty.
Harald
--
Harald Tveit Alvestrand, EDB Maxware, Norway
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Email messages: How ... Dave Crocker
- Re: Email messages: How ... Peter Deutsch
- Re: Email messages: How ... Dave Crocker
- Re: Email messages: How ... Richard Shockey
- Re: Email messages: How ... Peter Deutsch
- The Difficulty with Pate... Richard Shockey
- Re: Email messages: How ... Perry E. Metzger
- Re: Email messages: How large is ... thomas lakofski
- Re: Email messages: How large is too larg... Dick St.Peters
- RE: Email messages: How large is too ... Doug Sauder
- RE: Email messages: How large is too ... Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- RE: Email messages: How large is too large? Mason, Shane
- RE: Email messages: How large is too large? Randy Bush
- Re: Email messages: How large is too larg... George Michaelson
- RE: Email messages: How large is too large? Tim Dierks
- Re: Email messages: How large is too larg... Fred Marshall
- Re: Email messages: How large is too ... Reto Lichtensteiger
- Re: Email messages: How large is ... Jon Crowcroft
- Re: Email messages: How large is ... Dick St.Peters
- FW: Email messages: How large is too large? Robin Uyeshiro
- Re: Email messages: How large is too large? Vernon Schryver
