Dave;
> >I hope not, This will be the first IETF where this WG meets. This is -one-
> >of several methods being discussed. We haven't even reached closure on
> >the appropriate scope. This draft is an attempt to walk one vector of
> >the problem space.
>
> Not just "discussed". Tin Tan Wee has been working on this publicly for a
> couple of years and now has a well-supported, fully operational service.
The problem is that the problem to be solved (or discussed) is not
well defined.
You can still have well-supported, fully operational, but, purposeless
services.
Masataka Ohta
- Question re: an Internet-Draft and testing/deployment Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: Question re: an Internet-Draft and testing/dep... Bill Manning
- Re: Question re: an Internet-Draft and testing... Dave Crocker
- Re: Question re: an Internet-Draft and tes... Bill Manning
- Re: Question re: an Internet-Draft and tes... Keith Moore
- Re: Question re: an Internet-Draft and tes... Masataka Ohta
- Re: Question re: an Internet-Draft and testing/dep... Marc Blanchet
- Re: Question re: an Internet-Draft and testing/dep... Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: Question re: an Internet-Draft and testing... Valdis . Kletnieks
