Dave; > >I hope not, This will be the first IETF where this WG meets. This is -one- > >of several methods being discussed. We haven't even reached closure on > >the appropriate scope. This draft is an attempt to walk one vector of > >the problem space. > > Not just "discussed". Tin Tan Wee has been working on this publicly for a > couple of years and now has a well-supported, fully operational service. The problem is that the problem to be solved (or discussed) is not well defined. You can still have well-supported, fully operational, but, purposeless services. Masataka Ohta
- Question re: an Internet-Draft and testing/deployment Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: Question re: an Internet-Draft and testing/dep... Bill Manning
- Re: Question re: an Internet-Draft and testing... Dave Crocker
- Re: Question re: an Internet-Draft and tes... Bill Manning
- Re: Question re: an Internet-Draft and tes... Keith Moore
- Re: Question re: an Internet-Draft and tes... Masataka Ohta
- Re: Question re: an Internet-Draft and testing/dep... Marc Blanchet
- Re: Question re: an Internet-Draft and testing/dep... Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: Question re: an Internet-Draft and testing... Valdis . Kletnieks