Dave;

> >I hope not, This will be the first IETF where this WG meets. This is -one-
> >of several methods being discussed. We haven't even reached closure on
> >the appropriate scope. This draft is an attempt to walk one vector of
> >the problem space.
> 
> Not just "discussed".  Tin Tan Wee has been working on this publicly for a 
> couple of years and now has a well-supported, fully operational service.

The problem is that the problem to be solved (or discussed) is not
well defined.

You can still have well-supported, fully operational, but, purposeless
services.

                                                        Masataka Ohta

Reply via email to