At 10:39 AM 10/04/00 -0400, Keith Moore wrote:
> > The I-D in question has been referred to an existing IETF WG for review,
>
>that assertion was made, but not confirmed by the ADs.
>is it really true?  it seems odd because it really isn't in scope for wrec.

Let me jog your memory:

At 06:29 PM 30/12/99 +0100, Patrik Fältström wrote:
>A request has arrived to publish the named document as informational RFC. 
>The IESG wants all documents in this area to explicitely pass the WREC 
>working group, ...

I then sought clarification, re-sent the document to WREC (it had been sent 
before), to determine if there was a conflict - there wasn't. The authors 
re-submitted it.

John

---------------------------------------------------------------
Network Appliance           Direct / Voicemail: +31 23 567 9615
Kruisweg 799                               Fax: +31 23 567 9699
NL-2132 NG Hoofddorp               Main Office: +31 23 567 9600
---------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to