wrec is supposed to be about *web* replication and caching. which probably doesn't include email. so I can hardly blame them for not talking about port 25. since other kinds of interception proxies exist, perhaps they should clarify their document slightly to say it's about web interception proxies. naturally I would encourage folks who are concerned about web interception proxies to join the wrec group and/or to submit comments and corrections about their documents. Keith
- Re: interception proxies Vernon Schryver
- OSP Yixin Zhu
- Re: interception proxies Keith Moore
- Re: interception proxies Joe Touch
- Re: interception proxies Joe Touch
- Re: interception proxies Keith Moore
- Re: interception proxies Joe Touch
- Re: interception proxies Erik Nordmark
- Re: interception proxies Joe Touch
- Re: interception proxies Dick St.Peters
- Re: interception proxies Keith Moore
- Re: interception proxies Matt Crawford
- Re: interception proxies C. M. Heard