To combine the two long-running threads: The solution to the NAT problem is obvious - we need a submarine patent where somebody claims rights to NATs and then charges so much for licensing that it makes technically more sound solutions, say, IPv6, economically attractive. Indeed, I think we should get together a group of people to patent all the architecturally bad ideas (call it the "RSI group"), as they'll appear sooner or later. That will give us 20 years of respite...
- Hello Henning Schulzrinne
- Hello Ozair
- Re: Patent protection from NATs John Stracke
- Re: Patent protection from NATs Vernon Schryver