At 07:22 AM 4/24/00 -0400, David A Higginbotham wrote: >On another note, I have heard the argument that a unique identifier already >exists in the form of a MAC address why not make further use of it? Well, because it's too Ethernet-centric, for one thing! Other transport media (suitable to transport IP) do not necessarily base their link-levevl addressing on static schemes whose addresses are assigned at time of manufacture. Regards, Peter Johansson Congruent Software, Inc. 98 Colorado Avenue Berkeley, CA 94707 (510) 527-3926 (510) 527-3856 FAX [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- RE: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? David A Higginbotham
- RE: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Peter Johansson
- RE: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Dick St.Peters
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Anthony Atkielski
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Ralph Droms
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Joe Touch
- RE: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Manish R. Shah.
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Anthony Atkielski
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Anthony Atkielski