On Fri, 16 Jun 2000 18:14:56 +0300, "R.Ilker Gokhan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> >Somebody suggested QMail - the problem is that under high
> >volumes, it *isnt*
>
> No, it is used by Hotmail, USA.net, Yahoo! mail :-)..
I didn't say QMail wasn't usable under high volumes.
What I *said* was that most systems bottleneck under the strain of mail
*download*, not mail *sending*. You might want to check with Hotmail and
Yahoo to see how they implement POP3 checks - which incidentally aren't
QMail's job....
> >the sending of mail that will get you - it's all the Eudora
> >users who keep
> >checking their mail - you need a good/fast POP service more
> >than you need
> >fast mail delivery. I don't believe QMail has a POP service....
>
> No, vpopmail, qmail-pop3d etc...
No, those are *add ons*, aren't they? Again - that's not qmail, that's
your POP server.
--
Valdis Kletnieks
Operating Systems Analyst
Virginia Tech
PGP signature
