John;
> > You can have IP over HTTP, IP over XML or IP over WAP equally easily.
> >
> > The problem, however, is that the reconstruction point is an
> > intelligent gateway which violates the end to end principle.
>
> Mmm, how so? I'd see it as a router, which just happens to run over a
> higher-level protocol than most.
No, it is no router of the Internet. For example, your protocol does not
interact with the routing metric of the Internet.
> Not a great design, but it does (can)
> give you end-to-end IP.
Like NAT, it works most of the time, unless you try things
unsupported by the so intelligent gateway.
Of course, you can insist NAT offer end-to-end IP.
Masataka Ohta
- RE: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP Brijesh Kumar
- RE: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP Mohsen BANAN-Public
- RE: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP Brijesh Kumar
- Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP John Stracke
- Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP Mohsen BANAN-Public
- Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP Phil Karn
- Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP Masataka Ohta
- Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP Phil Karn
- Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP Masataka Ohta
- Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP John Stracke
- Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject W... Masataka Ohta
- Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP Magnus Danielson
- IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is ... Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re:... Magnus Danielson
- Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP John Stracke
- Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP Keith Moore
- Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP Mohsen BANAN-Public
- Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP Masataka Ohta
- Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP Dennis Glatting
- Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP Sean Doran
- Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP Keith Moore
