At 09:00 AM 6/25/00 -0400, Eric Brunner wrote:
>The IETF general list may not be the best venue for advocacy pieces written
>for non-specialists. The characterization of Keith Moore's and Franklin
>Reynold's works ("Substrate" and "CC/PP", resp.) are not substantive and
>in my opinion detract from or confuse a reading of your disrupt-the-web
>advocacy.
It seemed to fit in well enough with some of the WAP discussions here, but
okay.
>Serious pieces are welcome, there are people here on a number of other lists
>which are XML-specific or XML-related, but content is more engaging than
>glosses.
I didn't think anyone would appreciate my republishing the article here,
and it seemed that some cross-pollination between the XML community and the
IETF might be worthwhile on these issues.
Sorry for the, er, disruption.
Simon St.Laurent
XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed.
http://www.simonstl.com - XML essays and books
