Lloyd Wood wrote: > > users. This hurts developers, of course, because it limits our user > > base; but it also hurts the non-ISPs' users (obviously) *and* all other > > users (by Metcalfe's Law). > > ...but benefits the non-ISPs, who can charge for selectively > introducing any new service (even if it's e.g. by opening a port in > their firewall.) Only if they take the narrow view. In the long run, by putting up the walled garden, the non-ISP reduces the number of potential users for any new service, which makes it less likely for that service to get enough momentum to be accepted. And, of course, any new, popular Internet service is valuable to all ISPs, since it increases the value of their service. -- /=================================================================\ |John Stracke | http://www.ecal.com |My opinions are my own. | |Chief Scientist |================================================| |eCal Corp. |It's not an optical illusion, it just looks like| |[EMAIL PROTECTED]|one. | \=================================================================/
