Masataka: > If IETF makes it clear that AOL is not an ISP, it will commercially > motivate AOL to be an ISP. Keith: > probably not. folks who subscribe to AOL aren't likely to be > reading IETF documents. > face it, it's not the superior quality of AOL's service that keeps > AOLers from moving - it's their susceptibility to marketing BS and > their addiction to chat rooms. it's hard to help those people. Assuming they need help. The impression I have gotten from people who regularly use AOL is that they are generally satisfied with the nature of the service (as opposed to the quality of the service). As they discover more about the Internet, they may or may not switch to "real" ISPs, depending on whether they have needs for what "real" ISPs provide. --gregbo
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt John Stracke
- RE: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Bob Braden
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Masataka Ohta
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Greg Skinner
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Masataka Ohta
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Vernon Schryver
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Keith Moore
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Vernon Schryver
- precedence field and mailing lists Keith Moore
- AOL and standards Keith Moore
- AOL's view of the Net versus the rest Greg Skinner
- AOL's view of the Net versus the rest Anthony Atkielski
- Re: AOL's view of the Net versus the rest Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Greg Skinner
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Eli Sanchez
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Robert G. Ferrell
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Greg Skinner
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt John Stracke
