Hi -
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2000 11:58:28 +0530
> From: "Shaik Yunus Saleem" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Organization: Wipro Technologies,Telecom Solutions
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Reg MIB Augments
...
> when i augment an existing mib with a new one, should a walk
> issued on the old mib traverse to the new mib ?? This makes sense if
> the two tables are in the same node ie next in lexicographic order.But
> if these two tables are apart ,should a walk traverse into the new mib?
No, unless access control (e.g. RFC 2575) or RFC 2576 clause
4.1.2.1 has caused all the intervening stuff to be skipped.
> In this case the OID's change and order is no more lexicographic.
> Can we augment a scalar table ie system table with another
> scalar table??
...
It sounds like there's some confusion between "group" and
"table". See RFC 2578 clause 7.8 for the conditions where
AUGMENTS makes sense.
For further discussion on this topic, I suggest using the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing
lists.
-------------------------------------------------------
Randy Presuhn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: +1 408 546-1006 BMC Software, Inc. 1-3141
Fax: +1 408 965-0359 2141 North First Street
http://www.bmc.com/ San Jos�, California 95131 USA
-------------------------------------------------------
My opinions and BMC's are independent variables.
-------------------------------------------------------
