> We seem to be talking 5-6 orders of magnitude in > speed here. Even Moore's Law doesn't help in that range. I don't see why all this processing power is required. You look at the incoming address, you figure out which outbound path can handle that address, and you forward it. Simple. Even if the full address is a thousand digits long, you only have to look at the digits around your level to determine the next step in routing.
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not? Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not? Sean Doran
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not? Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not? Masataka Ohta
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not? Sean Doran
- NAT, v6, etc. Perry E. Metzger
- Re: NAT, v6, etc. Masataka Ohta
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not? Sean Doran
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not? Matt Crawford
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not? Steven M. Bellovin
- RE: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not? Anthony Atkielski
- RE: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why n... Philip J. Nesser II
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--w... Anthony Atkielski
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresse... Loa Andersson
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP add... Mike Bresina
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP add... Anthony Atkielski
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP... Bill Manning
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP... Anthony Atkielski
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresse... M�ns Nilsson
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP add... Anthony Atkielski
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresse... John Day
