Re: getting IPv6 space without ARIN (Re: PAT )

[Brian E Carpenter]

Valdis,

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
> Personally, I see a major swamp of private 6-over-4 tunnels between
> early implementors just WAITING to happen.  It;'s not bad if there's 2 or 3
> or 5 sites, but it's just a tad more then O(n)... ;)

What do you mean?

Firstly "6 over 4" refers specifically to RFC 2529. Do you mean standard
IPv6 tunnels as per RFC 1933 and its pending update?

If so, what's the problem? We expect millions of those during v6/v4 coexistence.
Why is that a swamp, assuming people get their prefixes from upstream?

  Brian