Robert Elz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There's nothing different this time, the established
> IPv4 network providers see something that is challenging
> their established way or operating
Funny, that's EXACTLY what an ATM fan said to me in 1995!
Sean.
- Deployment vs the IPv6 community's ambivalence towards ... Sean Doran
- Re: Deployment vs the IPv6 community's ambivalence... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Deployment vs the IPv6 community's ambivalence... Matt Crawford
- Re: Deployment vs the IPv6 community's ambivalence... vinton g. cerf
- Re: Deployment vs the IPv6 community's ambival... Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: Deployment vs the IPv6 community's ambival... Masataka Ohta
- Re: Deployment vs the IPv6 community's ambivalence... Sean Doran
- Re: Deployment vs the IPv6 community's ambival... Robert Elz
- Re: Deployment vs the IPv6 community's amb... Vijay Gill
- Re: Deployment vs the IPv6 community's amb... Sean Doran
- Re: Deployment vs the IPv6 community's... Robert Elz
- Re: Deployment vs the IPv6 community's ambivalence... Vernon Schryver
- Re: Deployment vs the IPv6 community's ambival... Robert Elz
- Re: Deployment vs the IPv6 community's ambival... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Deployment vs the IPv6 community's amb... Masataka Ohta
- Re: Deployment vs the IPv6 community's ambivalence... Vernon Schryver
- Re: Deployment vs the IPv6 community's ambival... Thomas Narten
- Re: Deployment vs the IPv6 community's amb... Rahul Banerjee
- Re: Deployment vs the IPv6 community's... Thomas Narten
- Re: Deployment vs the IPv6 community's... RJ Atkinson
