Tim, The April fool's day RFCs aside, I agree that not all I-Ds that fail to make the cut as an RFC are inferior. However, there are many other venues for publishing technical material, many of which subject the material to review. An I-D that contains good material but fails to become an RFC has other ways to become archival, cite-able, etc. Steve
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Dave Crocker
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Mark Allman
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Ole J. Jacobsen
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Garrett Wollman
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Stephen Kent
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Dave Crocker
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Pete Loshin
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Stephen Kent
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Greg Minshall
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Tim Salo
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Stephen Kent
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Bob Braden
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Vernon Schryver
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material RJ Atkinson
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Randy Bush
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Harald Alvestrand
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Pete Loshin
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Dave Crocker
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Jon Crowcroft
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Joe Touch
