> > IETF's current policy makes the I-D series more valuable than it would > > be if [...] I-Ds did not expire at all > > I see your point, but there's an easy solution. If there are two > interfaces (or one, with a checkbox), and the default is to search only the > I-Ds under 6 months old, then the noise level doesn't go up unless you > decide you need it to. actually my point isn't about the noise level associated with having additional documents returned in a search - it's about the I-D series being more useful for particular purposes *precisely because of mechanisms that are designed to limit, but not totally prevent, use of old I-Ds*. Keith
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as reference mate... Keith Moore
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as reference mate... Keith Moore
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as reference mate... Grenville Armitage
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as reference mate... Randy Bush
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as reference... Grenville Armitage
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as reference mate... Keith Moore
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as reference... Grenville Armitage
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as reference mate... John Stracke
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as reference mate... Stephen Kent
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as reference mate... Melinda Shore
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as reference mate... RJ Atkinson
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as reference... Melinda Shore
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as reference mate... Keith Moore
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as reference mate... Melinda Shore
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as reference mate... Keith Moore
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as reference... Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as reference mate... John C Klensin
