"Dawson, Peter D" wrote:
[..]
> and lets stick to the question of why/how ID's are
> reference in RFC's ....
That question was resolved within the first few days of
the original thread. In RFCs I-Ds can be cited non-normatively
as "work in progrees", and cannot be normatively cited. This
is existing practice.
cheers,
gja
- Proposal to deal with archiving of I-Ds Eliot Lear
- Re: Proposal to deal with archiving of I-Ds Keith Moore
- Re: Proposal to deal with archiving of I-Ds Bill Sommerfeld
- Re: Proposal to deal with archiving of I-Ds Eliot Lear
- RE: Proposal to deal with archiving of I-Ds Dawson, Peter D
- Re: Proposal to deal with archiving of I-Ds Melinda Shore
- RE: Proposal to deal with archiving of I-Ds Grenville Armitage
- RE: Proposal to deal with archiving of I-Ds Magnus Danielson
- RE: Proposal to deal with archiving of I-Ds Dawson, Peter D
- Re: Proposal to deal with archiving of I-Ds Melinda Shore
- Re: Proposal to deal with archiving of I-Ds J. Noel Chiappa
- Re: Proposal to deal with archiving of I-Ds Keith Moore
