Re: Need to preserve Internet Drafts

[Grenville Armitage]

Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
        [..]
> WGs are not procedurally necessary for a draft to reach publication,

So we add "and/or IESG" to the list of IETF/IRTF organs who might
be interested in an I-D, that's not much of a stretch.
After 6 months and no re-issue an I-D can be considered to be
of no interest to WGs or the IESG. That's all the warning
about 'validity' needs to convey to interested parties
who may be perusing a real or hypothetical archive of I-Ds.

cheers,
gja