> The I-D series already *is* permanently, publicly archived by that logic, there's no point in IETF creating its own archive. (after all, others are doing a fine job of it at no cost to IETF, right?) presumably folks who want this archive believe that IETF's creation of an archive will have some benefical effect, even given the existence of the other archvies, otherwise there would be no point in suggesting it. and presumably those who oppose the archive also believe it will have a negative effect. most of us were aware of the existence of the other archives. we still think that an IETF archive will make some difference. Keith
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as referenc... Russ Allbery
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as reference mat... vint cerf
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as reference mat... Bob Braden
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as referenc... Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as referenc... Kent Crispin
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as reference mat... Mike_Borella
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as reference mat... Vernon Schryver
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as reference mat... Keith Moore
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as reference mat... Garrett Wollman
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as reference mat... Keith Moore
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as referenc... Garrett Wollman
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as reference mat... John C Klensin