> From: Keith Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> if you try to build a global network out of limited-scope addresses you
> eventually end up reinventing IP at a higher layer.
Err, did you perhaps mean "end up reinventing globally unique addresses
somewhere else in the system"? :-)
Noel
<Another message from the Society for More Accurate Technical Terminology!>
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Jon Crowcroft
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! J. Noel Chiappa
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Keith Moore
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! J. Noel Chiappa
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Bradley Dunn
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Perry E. Metzger
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Sean Doran
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Keith Moore
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! RJ Atkinson
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Jon Crowcroft
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! J. Noel Chiappa
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Keith Moore
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Sean Doran
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! J. Noel Chiappa
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Angelos D. Keromytis
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Perry E. Metzger
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Daniel Senie
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Perry E. Metzger
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Sean Doran
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Kevin Farley
