At 07:33 AM 12/22/00 +0100, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
>At 20:17 21/12/2000 -0500, Tony Hansen wrote:
>>...an IRC server with one channel per working group and BOF, as part of
>>the "remote participation" effort?
>
>if some organization were to volunteer (and advertise!) this for
>Minneapolis, it could be fun to try.....with the number of laptops in the
>rooms, we could see an interesting example of simultaneous multilevel
>conversations......
My impression is that the primary benefit of real-time chat/instant-msging
in a working group is for PRIVATE exchanges, to consider contributions and
tactics by subsets of participants. One, open channel for the wg won't
help that.
d/
=-=-=-=-=
Dave Crocker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Brandenburg Consulting <www.brandenburg.com>
Tel: +1.408.246.8253, Fax: +1.408.273.6464
