> Anyone who has posted to the IETF list in the last week or two has
> gotten literally dozens of "out of office notification" messages from
> Microsoft Exchange clients. You would think the largest application
> software provider in the world would understand the difference between
> envelope and message headers, but apparently not. (You would also
> think that, as with many Unix based mailers, they'd understand notions
> like not sending automated replies if the person isn't in the header
> To: or CC: lines, but apparently that behavior is also too complicated
> for them to understand.)
i'll see ya' and raise ya' o ne better. mailing list owners get the
appended from microsft corporate. note the lack of information on which
addressee's mail is bouncing, but it tells me to "Verify that the recipient
address is correct."
From: "Automated Virus Gateway (do not reply)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mail could not be delivered
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2000 23:05:35 -0800
****** Message from InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT ******
The following mail could not be delivered.
Reason: Exceeded Maximum Delivery Attempts. Verify that the recipient
address is correct.
***************** End of message ***************
-----
Message-ID: <4.3.2.7.2.20001225220830.00d07630@csi-admin1>
From: Ron Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: draft-santitoro-rap-policy-errorcodes-01.txt
Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2000 22:09:13 -0800
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2651.58)
x-sender: ronc@csi-admin1
....
nya nya nya :-)
randy
