> second, if someone must send an executable attachment , then we have a > signing server that signs the attachment as trustworthy and how, and using what criteria, would the signing server evaluate the trustworthiness of the attachment? e.g. I might consider an attachment that installed NetBSD on top of an existing Windows system to be absolutely trustworthy (so long as it did it's job well) and performing a valuable community service, but others might not agree... (they might insist that Linux be installed instead.) Keith
- Re: Eliminating Virus Spam Robert Elz
- Re: Eliminating Virus Spam James M Galvin
- Re: Eliminating Virus Spam Francis Dupont
- Re: Eliminating Virus Spam Harald Alvestrand
- Re: Eliminating Virus Spam Jon Crowcroft
- Re: Eliminating Virus Spam Michael Richardson
- Re: Eliminating Virus Spam Russ Allbery
- Re: Eliminating Virus Spam Michael Richardson
- multipart/signed (was Re: Eliminating Virus Sp... Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
- Re: Eliminating Virus Spam Harald Alvestrand
- Re: Eliminating Virus Spam Keith Moore
- Re: Eliminating Virus Spam Jon Crowcroft
- Re: Eliminating Virus Spam Vernon Schryver
- Re: Eliminating Virus Spam Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: Eliminating Virus Spam Vernon Schryver
