> simply put and well stated..but I do suspect that the current NAT problem > can be solved by the proper deployment of applications that MUST have > routeable addresses. no, it's the other way around. the existence of NATs is keeping those applications from being widely deployed. Keith
- Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Bill Manning
- RE: Number of Firewall/NAT Users vint cerf
- RE: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Bernard D. Aboba
- RE: Number of Firewall/NAT Users vint cerf
- Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Jim McMurry
- Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Keith Moore
- Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users J. Noel Chiappa
- Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Ed Gerck
- Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Matt Holdrege
- RE: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Richard Shockey
- Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Keith Moore
- Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Keith Moore
- Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Keith Moore
- Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Joel Jaeggli
- Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Daniel Senie
- Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Matt Holdrege
- Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Daniel Senie
- Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Keith Moore
