Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users

[Brian E Carpenter]

Henning Schulzrinne wrote:
...
> However, I think it's high time to establish a "Good Housekeeping" seal
> for "real" (pure, unadultared, GM-free, ...) Internet service, i.e.,
> 
> - without "transparent" caches

Do you mean interception proxies, in WREC terminology? 

> - no port restrictions

And no protocol type restrictions

> - no NATs

How about adding IPv6 support?
> 
> (and whatever other abominations one might want to add to this list).
> Seems like a good role for ISOC, for example :-)

The ISOC isn't a trade association, which is where such seals
of approval (and the associated b*ke-offs) tend to come from.

    Brian