so this is like hop/hop or bilateral exchanges, presuming that there
 is no policy consideration between any given two points along the 
 complete path (outbound & return) that finds your particular packet
 "offensive" and tosses it w/o any abilitiy to notify the originating 
 party. 


% 
% The point being that if you have an arbitrary bunch of firewalls and
% NATs between any two points, then you are forced into telephone-like
% "call set-up" scenarios, which don't really scale to large groups,
% specially when the application consists of sporadic messages to
% arbitrary destinations. 
% 
% -----Original Message-----
% From: Keith Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
% Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 6:01 PM
% To: Bill Manning
% Cc: Keith Moore; David T. Perkins; Michael Richardson; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
% Subject: Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables 
% 
% 
% > e.g.  it takes (at least) two to tango... or peer.
% 
% "at least".  yes.
% 
% Keith
% 
% 


-- 
--bill

Reply via email to