Jun'an Gao wrote: > > The host *is* the edge of the network. > > I'm sorry to have not mentioned that I consider the host nodes, or the end nodes, >are not edges but instead something attaching on network edges. I consider the very >last hub, or the access router which the end nodes connected to as the 'network edge'. So there's no network between me and another computer on the same unswitched Ethernet? -- /==============================================================\ |John Stracke | http://www.ecal.com |My opinions are my own.| |Chief Scientist |=============================================| |eCal Corp. |Piscatorice non aristotelice. | |[EMAIL PROTECTED]| | \==============================================================/
- RE: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Jun'an Gao
- RE: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Larry Foore
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Keith Moore
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Jon Crowcroft
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Colin Perkins
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Jun'an Gao
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Harald Alvestrand
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Jun'an Gao
- RE: An alternative to TCP (part 1) aaron
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Richard Carlson
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) John Stracke
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Bob Braden
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Keith Moore
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Mark Allman
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Kevin Farley
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) John Stracke
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Mahadevan Iyer
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Richard Carlson
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Jun'an Gao
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Jun'an Gao
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Jun'an Gao
