I found this news report of some concern, not because of what ICANN is 
supposed to have done or not done, but because it seems there is a 
presumption by some that ICANN is answerable to US Congress.  I understood 
that the whole purpose of setting up ICANN was to provide Internet 
governance that was trans-national, not answerable to US Government.

#g
--


"ICANN Faces Hearing in Congress Over Domain Selections"
Computerworld Online (02/02/01); Thibodeau, Patrick

On Feb. 8, the House Commerce Committee will hold a hearing to examine 
whether ICANN's
approval of only seven new top level domains hampers competition. Critics 
of ICANN will likely
request that the committee make ICANN reopen the selection process. 
Congress might even
attempt to get the Department of Commerce to keep the new TLDs from being 
introduced,
according to insiders. DotTV CEO Lou Kerner has been discussing the issue 
with the House
Commerce Committee and might testify at the coming hearing. Other critics 
include the
ACLU and many of the unsuccessful TLD applicants, several of which might 
take ICANN to
court. Others think ICANN's limited introduction was wise. ICANN's former 
chairwoman,
Esther Dyson, wanted to introduce more TLDs, but she sides with ICANN, 
saying that the
organization needed to limit the number of TLDs because of technical 
concerns. ICANN's
choice was "reasonable" at the time, asserts Dyson. "It's pretty obvious 
that more TLDs
means more opportunity for small businesses and entrepreneurs to get 
meaningful domain
names that reflect their business interests as well as [their] free speech 
interests," says
Domain Name Rights Coalition President Mikki Barry. The controversy ought 
to be expected,
as there would be no need for ICANN if there were no difficult decisions to 
be made, asserts
Jonathan Zittrain, the co-director of the Berkman Center for Internet & 
Society at Harvard
University. The government would not have the support of businesses if it 
attempted to
resume control over the domain name process, asserts Rick Lane, director of 
e-commerce
and Internet technology at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.
http://www.infoworld.com/articles/hn/xml/01/02/02/010202hnicann.xml



------------
Graham Klyne
([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Reply via email to