In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Henning Schulzrinne writes:
>I would suggest stone tablets. This encourages conciseness and simpler
>protocols. Plus, it has more effect when you hit an implementor that
>doesn't adhere to the spec with the tablet.
>
I personally would prefer clay tablets for drafts.  When the IESG 
approves them, we can just fire the clay.

                --Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb


Reply via email to