> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 3:37 AM
> To: Doug Sauder
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: HTML better for small PDAs
>
>
> 1) Was your millenia-old data *written in XML*, or was it *converted to*
> XML
> within the past 5 years?
>
>
>
This is not a valid argument. Egyptian Hieroglyphs were not written
in ASCII either !
- HTML better for small PDAs Doug Sauder
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs Valdis . Kletnieks
- RE: HTML better for small PDAs Doug Sauder
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs graham . travers
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs Valdis . Kletnieks
- RE: HTML better for small PDAs Doug Sauder
- RE: HTML better for small PDAs Doug Sauder
- RE: HTML better for small PDAs Christian Huitema
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs Robert G. Ferrell
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs Valdis . Kletnieks
- RE: HTML better for small PDAs graham . travers
- RE: HTML better for small PDAs Christian Huitema
- RE: HTML better for small PDAs graham . travers
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs Michael Richardson
