> There have been several proposals recently and many over the years to > replace the current encoding rules for RFCs. Check some of the recent > threads at http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/ietf/Current/threads.html blah, blah, blah. i'm familiar with this thread, and the thread that pops up every 6 months or so... but where is the actual "proposal". all i see is the usual "wouldn't it be nice if" and never anything concrete. if someone actually produces a proposal, then we can discuss it or nuke it. perhaps a more useful mode of discussion would be to determine what criteria should be used for the rfc publication process and whether incremental improvements are possible, independent of encoding changes. /mtr
- An I-D experiment (Re: HTML better for small PDAs) Harald Alvestrand
- Re: An I-D experiment (Re: HTML better for small P... Michael Richardson
- Re: An I-D experiment (Re: HTML better for small P... Vernon Schryver
- RE: An I-D experiment (Re: HTML better for small P... graham . travers
- Re: An I-D experiment (Re: HTML better for small P... Michael Richardson
- RE: An I-D experiment (Re: HTML better for small P... Rosen, Brian
- RE: An I-D experiment (Re: HTML better for small P... Dave Crocker
- Re: An I-D experiment (Re: HTML better for small P... Marshall T. Rose
- Re: An I-D experiment (Re: HTML better for small P... Marshall T. Rose
- Re: An I-D experiment (Re: HTML better for small P... Vernon Schryver
- Re: An I-D experiment (Re: HTML better for small P... Marshall T. Rose
- Re: An I-D experiment (Re: HTML better for small P... Dave Crocker
