> What happens now is silliness due to > the known queue length - we put things in we know are deficient, > always assuming we will have the issues resolved before it wends it's > way through the queue. Where in the world do you get that idea? I spent four years on IESG and I can't recall a single instance of this happening. Seems like what we have now is a lot of uninformed speculation. Keith
- rfc publication suggestions Dave Crocker
- Re: rfc publication suggestions Vernon Schryver
- Re: rfc publication suggestions Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: rfc publication suggestions Dave Crocker
- Re: rfc publication suggestions Russ Allbery
- Re: rfc publication suggestions Kastenholz, Frank
- Re: rfc publication suggestions Fred Baker
- RE: rfc publication suggestions Rosen, Brian
- RE: rfc publication suggestions Rosen, Brian
- Re: rfc publication suggestions Keith Moore
- Re: rfc publication suggestions Eric Rosen
- RE: rfc publication suggestions Rosen, Brian
- RE: rfc publication suggestions Rosen, Brian
- Re: rfc publication suggestions Keith Moore
- RE: rfc publication suggestions Timothy J. Salo
- RE: rfc publication suggestions Scott Bradner
- RE: rfc publication suggestions ned . freed
- RE: rfc publication suggestions Vernon Schryver
- RE: rfc publication suggestions Bob Braden
- Re: rfc publication suggestions Bob Braden