<<On Sun, 18 Mar 2001 16:06:18 +0100, Harald Alvestrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

> note: I have not yet found anything that allows me to tell the difference 
> between a switch and something that is not a switch. That is one reason why 
> I prefer to avoid the term.

Hmmm.  I always thought that the definition of ``switch'' in a packet
context was fairly well-understood:

        A switch is a device which accepts a packet, performs some
        computation on the contents of the packet combined with
        internal state, and uses the result of that computation to
        determine where (if anywhere) to forward the packet.

Thus, a router is a kind of switch (one which implements the
internetwork layer of the Internet reference model), but so is a
bridge and so is a NAT.

I'm not sure whence comes the marketing definition of ``switch'' as
anything that processes packets faster than a competitor's product,
but I've long since given up trying to understand the thought
processes of marketing people.

-GAWollman

Reply via email to