Kevin Farley wrote:
> --- John Stracke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Today, if you want to
> > spam all of
> > them, you have to subscribe to all of them, which is impractical.
(I spoke sloppily, by the way. For "today", read "with separate filters
on every list".)
> Impractical, but through software, not impossible. Could readily be
> automated.
If that's so, then subscriber filters won't work; as soon as it becomes
profitable to do so, the spamware vendors will include automated
subscription features.
--
/===============================================================\
|John Stracke | http://www.ecal.com |My opinions are my own. |
|Chief Scientist |==============================================|
|eCal Corp. |Whose cruel idea was it for the word "lisp" to|
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|have an "S" in it? |
\===============================================================/
