Jim needs to select those postings related to the topic and post the rest
elsewhere.
Stick to your position Harald!

Jiwoong Lee wrote:

> Wheter Jim's point of view is right or wrong, part of his postings are
> related to a topic
>
>     - Discussion of IETF administrative policies
>
> , which is declared to be an appropriate posting in IETF Discussion List by
> RFC3005.
>
> Some postings are professional since they are dealing with technical matters
> of Internet.
> Some postings are informative since they contain hyper links that are
> internet-technical, while most
> of them are imflammatory.
>
> IPv8 (or whatever) seems related to ther work of the Internet Engineering
> Task Force, on the basis of the first statement of overview of
> IETF(http://www.ietf.org/overview.html), saying:
>
> The Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) is a large open international
> community of network designers, operators, vendors, and researchers
> concerned with the evolution of the Internet architecture and the smooth
> operation of the Internet. It is open to any interested individual.
>
> , without regards to the fact that the IETF 'has chosen' other alternative.
>
> I guess his postings are not laming IETF's constructive work and procedures
> for now.
> If posted opinion is right, the society will accept it. If not, will not.
>
> Jiwoong
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Harald Alvestrand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Jim Fleming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 4:28 PM
> Subject: Public warning: Please cease inappropriate posting
>
> > Jim,
> >
> > after having reviewed the multitude of email that you have sent to the
> IETF
> > list over the past week, I find that it does not conform to the guidelines
> > in RFC 3005 for appropriate posting to the IETF list.
> >
> > Your postings are unprofessional, noninformative, inflammatory, and to a
> > large degree (such as dealing with "IPv8") unrelated to the work of the
> > IETF.
> >
> > You have established a pattern of such postings; when the previous
> outburst
> > subsided in early August, many of us hoped that you had found reason to
> > cease this inappropriate activity, but plainly, you have not.
> >
> > If this pattern continues, action according to RFC 3005 will be taken.
> >
> >                    Harald Tveit Alvestrand
> >                        IETF Chair
> >
> >
> >

Reply via email to