> -----Original Message----- > From: Dawson Frank (NMP/Irving) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2001 12:39 PM > To: 'ext Hollenbeck, Scott' > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Last Call: Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps to > Proposed Standard > > > > So, the RFC2445 isn't "invalid per XML schema". Rather the opposite is > true.
Perhaps, but the point I was trying to make isn't about the W3C ignoring IETF work or vice-versa. A "one size fits all" specification isn't likely to meet everyone's needs, and the situation with 2445 and XML Schema is just one example of a situation where the given size didn't fit someone for some reason. The point I was trying to make is that the timestamps document seems to provide a reasonable compromise between being too restrictive and too permissive. -Scott-
